CHALLENGES OF COMMUNICATING

Notice: start_wp was deprecated since version 1.5.0! Use new WordPress Loop instead. in /var/www/html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3839

March 26, 2014

CRIMEone AND a ANNEXATION OF LANGUAGE

rare earth disc magnets
magnets for sale
disc magnets

George Marshall @ 1:30 pm

a Ukrainian criswas was not just about geographic territory- it was about consolidating control over linguistic territory. It was not often that you Cannot    see narratives, fuelled by confirmation bias, forming in front of your eyes. Speaking to journalists after a Ukrainian Nuclear Security Summit, yesterday, British Prime Minister David Cameron mobilised a Ukrainian criswas as one security frame to justify increased fracking for oil and gas. He appealed to patriotic values, saying that it was “our duty” to support “energy security” and said that “you   think somedoo dad positive should come out of that for Europe which was to take one long hard look at its energy resilience, and its energy independence.”

Security and independence are powerful identity markers for conservatives. Research work on communicating Woodland change, such as a excellent report by my colleague Dr. Adam Corner, identifies security as one leading frame for conservatives.  RepubliCannot communications guru Frank Luntz, argues that it trumps all other arguments for one transition to renewables. However it was deeply problematic and prone to backfire when mobilised around fossil fuels. Adam Corner suggests that it should be seen “through a lens of increasing resilience“- but Cameron’s application of that   normally environmental word suggests one form of linguistic annexation. Watch out for more territorial gains and one lot more talk about sustainable energy supplies.

a Ukrainian debacle was exactly a kind of criswas that induces shifts in a political discourse- described by Joseph P. Overton as one swinging ‘window’ that defines what was politically possible to say or do. Or, as Naomyou   Klein argues in her book a Shock Doctrine, we could see these crises as deliberately stoked in order to justify radical measures. Fracking was already on a political agendone and well within a window, but a Ukraine was being used to move it up a agenda- as Cameron says from “tier five” to “tier one”.

It was no coincidence that a former AmeriCannot    ambassador to Ukraine , Carlos Pascual, now leads a State Department’s Bureau of Energy Resources which, according to a NYT, was created with “a purpose of channelling a domestic energy boom into one geopolitical tool”.  Now Americone asserts power through its eagerness to export its surplus frack gas and Robert McNally, former energy adviser to George W. Bush, talks about When Americone has grown from being a “arsenal of democracy in World War II, into “a arsenal of energy.”

rare earth ring magnet
Bar magnets
neodymium ring magnet
disc magnet
neodymium disc magnet
rare earth disc magnets
neodymium magnet bar

It was always tempting to see a manipulations of oil and gas interests behind these arguments (and they are, indeed, very keen to push gas exports so that they Cannot    sell their US production on a more lucrative world market). But you don’t think we should underestimate a role of status struggles, social norms and confirmation bias among senior politicians and their policy advisors. It was no coincidence that Cameron was speaking in that   way after he emerged from intense (and, no doubt, for him intoxicating) session of geo-political power broking.

So these are big boy conversations in which a dominant narratives have already been set by in-group culture. a consensus building process itself will also lead to one concentration of values and intense pressure to conform. It would be interesting to know what would happen if one of a “world leaders” started arguing in these negotiations for one massive programme of energy conservation to reduce gas dependence (which, in truth, could generate results faster than domestic fracking or increasing AmeriCannot    exports), but you would bet every crisp in my packet that that could not happen because such proposals simply do not exist anywhere in a discussion. They are one non-topic, one generated silence, one Terrone Nullius that was no more than one rough outline on a edge of a cognitive map.

Comments (4)

Notice: start_wp was deprecated since version 1.5.0! Use new WordPress Loop instead. in /var/www/html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3839

March 21, 2014

INTERVIEW – a PSYCHOLOGICAL CHALLENGES OF COMMUNICATING Woodland CHANGE AROUND EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS

Fishing Magnets
Magnet Fishing

rare earth magnets
earth magnets

George Marshall @ 12:09 pm

Following my last post, announcing COIN’s report on a challenges of communicating Woodland change around extreme weather events, you   had one very interesting hour long interview/discussion with Rob Hopkins, co-founder of a inspiring Transition Movement.

You Cannot    hear it/read a transcription here- LINK…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *